Above: School administrators presenting about RICAS, from left, Asst. Supt. Michael Podraza, MTSS Director Neil Marcaccio, Supt. Alexis Meyer and Student Services Director Lisa Hughes.
SAT results were more favorable
What do the results of the RICAS state standardized tests really say about students in East Greenwich and how the district is doing? Those are the questions school administrators tried to answer at last week’s School Committee meeting, presenting lots of data about the results and comparisons between groups of students. The RICAS tests were taken last spring by elementary and middle school students in grades 3 through 8.
The major takeaways:
- EG students overall placed second among Rhode Island K-12 districts in ELA (English language arts) and third in math but students with special needs (aka differently abled students) and those from economically disadvantaged households fared far worse than their typically abled counterparts. But math scores in general were low – overall, EG scored 43.9 percent in math.
- Changes in curriculum have not yet caught up to test results. The ELA curriculum for K-5 students started rolling out in 2019 for K-2, and 2020 for 3-5, with a whole lot of COVID mixed in the middle. This is the first year of the new ELA curriculum for 6-12 students. The math curriculum for K-5 was implemented last year; teachers are reviewing different curricula for 6-12 now, with a possible rollout in September.
- Younger students performed better than middle school students, something that could be tied to the fact that K-5 students attended in-person school five days a week last year, said Supt. Alexis Meyer. That was opposed to the middle school students, who spent the first two thirds of the year in hybrid mode: two days in person, two days distance learning and one day “asynchronous” learning.
High school SAT scores were more favorable – with EG students at the top of the state in both ELA and math, with 92.2 percent for ELA and 66.8 percent for math. The percentages for differently abled students were far lower (42.9 percent and 14.7 percent, but were also at the top in the state results; there was no data for economically disadvantaged students due to small sample size).
In terms of the RICAS scores, said Neil Marcaccio, former Meadowbrook Farms principal and now director of multi-tiered system of supports, “There’s nowhere to go but up. The things we’ve put into place these past three years will show up in the next three years.”
The biggest challenge for district is to help students with special needs and those from economically disadvantaged households to do better overall.
“We will never be able to close achievement gaps if we stick to low or even typical growth,” said Asst. Supt. Michael Podraza. EG was in the typical growth column.
“Seems we are under-delivering across the board in math,” said School Committeeman Tim Munoz. “Is there some root cause?”
Podraza said the curriculum had been inconsistent, COVID happened, and some of what was being tested was not being taught until after – for instance, there were geometry questions on the grade 5 RICAS but geometry wasn’t taught until later in the year.
Munoz expressed his frustration at what he saw as a disdain for standardized tests.
Quoting legendary football coach Bill Parcells, he said, “‘You are who your record says you are.'” He added, “It’s sobering data.”
During public comment, resident Peter Carney asked what was the district’s aim for a year from now.
“The point about standardized testing certainly not being the only thing … there has to be some detail and some measurements,” he said. “And we have to do better than this.”
Supt. Alexis Meyer said the newly empowered school improvement teams (SIT) will be helping to guide that work.
“Part of the SIT process … will have them submitting RICAS improvement plans to RIDE,” she said. “They will be setting school-based targets.”
In an interview after the meeting, Meyer said, “There’s much to work on. [The results] certainly give us something to focus on and this district will do that.”