School Committee Approves Mask Mandate 

by | Aug 18, 2021

Editor’s note: This story was amended at 7:45 a.m. Aug. 18 for clarity.

The mandate for all kicks in at “substantial” or “high” COVID-19 transmissions rates

In a special session Tuesday night, the School Committee voted 6-0 to approve a COVID-19 policy requiring universal masking for students and staff when rates of virus transmission are categorized as “substantial” or “high” by the state Department of Health. As of Aug. 17, the state’s transmission rate was high.

At rates of “moderate” transmission, masks will be recommended for those who have been vaccinated and required for those who have not been vaccinated, although the School Committee wrote some flexibility into the policy for Supt. Alexis Meyer regarding mask wearing for middle and high school students.

Masks are not required outdoors.

“I’m gratified by the process. We had meaningful discussion and we took many of the revisions,” said School Committee Chair Anne Musella, referring to changes made to the policy during the meeting, some reflecting concerns heard in public comment. “We truly want to do what’s best for all our students while ensuring the health and safety of all.”

Early on in the meeting, the School Committee got word the state’s governing board on elementary and secondary education had just passed a resolution instructing the state Department of Education (RIDE) to reject any school district’s back-to-school plan that did not include a mask mandate. The action appeared to try to override Gov. Dan McKee’s decision to leave masking rules up to individual school districts (unlike last year, when Gov. Gina Raimondo mandated masks for all students and staff).

Because the School Committee’s draft policy included a mask requirement at higher transmission levels, the committee did not see a reason to delay its work.

Public comment and discussion on the proposed “COVID-19 Health and Safety Protocols and Procedures” policy (which included the language on masking) took up nearly all of the three-hour-plus meeting, with around 30 people in attendance in person and close to 100 following on Zoom. 

Questions and comments were more granular than at last week’s session, which also lasted for hours and included lots of public comment and discussion. Part of that was the recognition that the School Committee was most likely going to approve a policy that would include some kind of mask mandate. Several commenters wanted to know more about how discipline would be meted out for mask-wearing infractions (on a case-by-case basis, said Supt. Alexis Meyer) and whether or not mask breaks could be taken away as punishment (no, as a change in the policy Tuesday night reflected). 

But there was also frustration that the School Committee was not appreciating East Greenwich’s high vaccination rates.

“Instead of getting the sense of how things are evolving we are going to the worst-case scenario right off the bat,” said EG resident Andy Naporano. “I’m disappointed we couldn’t look at this backwards: we have high vaccination rates and an intelligent community…. ” He added, “Get rid of the pessimism. This is a great place to be right now. I encourage you to stop looking at the glass half empty.”

“To the point of optimism … we are not in the same place we were last year,” Meyer stressed. “We do have tents, we have outdoor classrooms at Eldredge, at the high school…. We should utilize every opportunity to be outside. There will be ample opportunity to have breaks.”

She added the beginning of the school year was shaping up to look much more like a regular year.

I met with the PTG presidents yesterday. They are planning outdoor picnics, a 6th grade movie night … I was incredibly encouraged yesterday,” she said.

Another commenter said she wasn’t sure what she would tell her children,“who spent the summer mask free, fully vaccinated and having the time of their lives, making up for a summer that was the worst of their lives last year.” She was particularly worried because both of her children have asthma and she said they had difficulty breathing with a mask on. 

“We’ve done everything we’ve been asked to do … our family’s fully vaccinated … and yet here we are, at what I feel like is back to square one,” she said.

Meyer said people with health concerns should reach out to their children’s principal and school nurse. 

Several commenters mentioned the idea of students being able to take off their masks while sitting quietly at their desks; that suggestion was not taken up by the School Committee. 

Among the changes made to the policy during the meeting Tuesday was one to give Supt. Meyer more discretion regarding mask policy during a period of “moderate” virus spread, in particular at the high school and middle school, allowing for less requirement and more recommendation of mask wearing. 

The policy also allows for Meyer to bring any revisions directly to the whole School Committee instead of first bringing it to the policy subcommittee, which would slow down any changes. Just before the panel voted – unanimously – for the revised policy, committeeman Gene Quinn spoke to the underlying concern about the now-dominant Delta variant and its increased contagiousness. 

“Our objective here is to open schools safely and keep them open safely,” he said. 

You can watch the Aug. 17 meeting on our Facebook page HERE. The School Committee’s next meeting is Aug. 31; the first day of school is Wednesday, Sept. 8.

Value the news you get here on East Greenwich News? As a 501-c3, we depend on reader support. Become a sustaining (monthly) donor or make a one-time donation! Click on the Donate button below or send a check to EG News, 18 Prospect St., East Greenwich, RI 02818. Thanks.

6 Comments

  1. Misleading

    This article is so misleading – “The mandate kicks in at “substantial” or “high” COVID-19 transmissions rates”?? The policy requires masking for children under the age of 12 at ANY level of transmission.

    Reply
    • egnews

      Apologies for any confusion. I have amended the story to clarify. Thanks for the comment.

      Reply
  2. Eugene Quinn

    Not to be picky, but my comment was that our objective was to open schools SAFELY and keep them open, with an emphasis on SAFELY.

    Reply
    • Elizabeth McNamara

      Gene, I have amended the quote. Apologies.

      Reply
  3. CR

    CDC states that they estimate 600 children died of the flu in 2019-20, maybe more.

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/spotlights/2019-2020/2019-20-pediatric-flu-deaths.htm

    No one was mandating the flu vaccine for people despite being recommended by the CDC, AND schools were not masking children.

    To date, there are 400 children’s deaths due to COVID in a longer span of time.

    The lambda variant is next. It will be immune to all vaccinations so even after kids 5-12 get vaccinated, they, and everyone else, will still be in masks because of the next variant….and the next variant….etc.

    A few years will go by, kids will have been wearing masks for 3-4 school years and we will have 3rd and possible 4th graders who will never have attended school without a mask.

    Effectively, by not allowing the experts to decide what is best for children, you have prolonged the masks for the foreseeable future. And by experts, I mean parents. We know our children better than anyone.

    Reply
    • Fed up in EG

      Great point CR. One that no one (on the board) wants to even listen to anymore. Parents are starting to pull their kids out of public schools to homeschool and attend private schools. It’s pretty mind blowing how people don’t see what’s happening. Re-read your history books people. Time to WAKE UP!

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Latest Streaming